Architecture
Design arguments: logical consequences of the premises and threat model.
- D1: Human-as-Controller, AI-as-Observer/Stabilizerdesign-argumentThe control topology places the human as controller of ends and the machine as observer/stabilizer, with capacity for self-directed action as objective and caring (Mayeroff 1971) as normative orientation.
- D2: Capacity as Terminal Objective (Meta-Capability Defense)design-argumentFor an agency-supporting system, capacity for self-directed action is the only non-contradictory terminal objective; any other objective optimizes for something the person did not choose.
- D3: Caring Constraints as Normative Orientationdesign-argumentStructural caring requirements (Mayeroff 1971) translate into testable invariants (I1-I6) that operationalize the normative stance as engineering requirements and prevent the architecture from being directed to exploit degraded human states.
- D4: Two-Layer Machine (Understanding + State-Estimation)design-argumentThe machine requires two layers (understanding + state-estimation), both necessary, neither sufficient alone: without state-estimation the understanding layer interacts with degraded humans without knowing it; without understanding the state-estimation layer cannot determine helpful vs harmful intervention.
No sections match this filter.